"SELECTED" is a funny way of putting it when you have tens of thousands of unsorted images with meaningless filenames. And when last year you posted 48,000 unsorted pictures with the same tagline. But whatever, I guess.

Page 73 doesn't look very selectable, in my opinion, either. Or 35. But that's just my opinion.

In the past you said a criterion of yours was that images be color. There are lots of high quality monochromatic images out there. I have a feeling you just did a siterip by tag and did no work to organize anything.

My biggest critique is that your gallery title is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: added this in response to a reply.
@zlatko-redact:
>It looks like you don't know the meaning of the word "Selected".
I'm a native english speaker, and can tell you that used in context, selection usually implies that an effort was made to curate something. But you don't even have the decency to sort them, which takes a bare minimum of effort.

But okay. Ostensibly, yeah, an SQL SELECT statement to the effect of 'select all color pictures with at least this rating that aren't of scat, obesity, etc.' is a selection. But 'selected' implies that care was taken. Clearly, none was, or these would be sorted. And I think images 35 and 73 for instance also show that not much care was taken. 35 isn't even an illustration. it's a 3D render that I am assuming wasn't tagged when your script downloaded it.

> And if you have a lot of free time, look here! - /g/2102990/361c3fcbca/
> GG_00_JOJO already posted more than 40 thousand random furry pictures. Really random.
> Why don't you amuse him too? Do you understand all the words in the title of his gallery?
Yes, and I can tell you why I don't "amuse" him, too.
1) he doesn't claim "SELECTED" in all caps in the title.
2) his files are organized so that sequential images are in sequential order. To use smaller words, they are next to each other instead of spread across multiple 2000-image-each galleries.
3) his files have names that have some semblance of sense behind them and are amenable to organizing.
4) While I personally think you have better taste in terms of image contents than he(?) does - I appreciate the relative lack of fat - his contributions might actually be worthwhile to someone with similar tastes to himself because the files are sorted. Yours are 'sorted' by SHA256 checksum, meanwhile.
5) His title makes it clear that it's his personal collection. Unlike yours. And no, that's not because I'm dumb. It's because your phrasing (and selection of words) is poor.

So basically, he put more thought and effort into the presentation/sharing of his collection than you have, and his title isn't easily misconstrued in the way that yours can be.

Last edited on 08 January 2022, 18:34.

Base +23, Tearlow +24, IttePerkele +6, El_L0b0 +7, srmalloy +7, j-man +12, Adelyakumo +6, BlazinRoc +7, Nosk447 +3, Hymne2 +6, Fuzzwood +8

@dragontamer8740 hello to you my dear funny friend! It looks like you don't know the meaning of the word "Selected".
And you didn't even think of looking in the dictionary. Sadly.
In fact, there is no lie in the name of my gallery. There is only stupidity in your comments.
And if you have a lot of free time, look here! - /g/2102990/361c3fcbca/
GG_00_JOJO already posted more than 40 thousand random furry pictures. Really random.
Why don't you amuse him too? Do you understand all the words in the title of his gallery?

Base +7, Adelyakumo -6, BlazinRoc -7, Hymne2 -6, Fuzzwood -8, Deknoy +6

Anyway, WHATS THE POINT of just reposting thousands of images from server to server?..
No theme, no sorting, no tagging, no high resolution.
Quality gallery is a gallery with some logic behind: a common author or theme.

As it is - it's a garbage. Yeah, a garbage of relatively fine pictures, but still a garbage.
Or, if you insist, GG_00_JOJO's are garbage, and yours are junk piles.

Base +16, BlazinRoc +7, Hymne2 +6, Fuzzwood +8, Deknoy -6