As I had given construcive criticism to Coinflip a few years back, I shall give you same. The sequence is nice, but you have waaaaay too many filler panels with the exact same shot and an ultra minor change in between. Consider taking out 3 or 4 panels in the mix and shortening the transformation time. Here's some examples:
9-16 has 8 frames 17-23 has 7 frames 24-31 has 8 frames (yes 24 is a bit different but the pose and intent remains) 33-44 had a whopping 12 frames
You get the idea. That is literally pages 9-44 (minus page 32) in some way of duplicating work to show minor changes and gives way too much fluff. You have 3 pages on this gallery alone, and 23 out of your first 40 pages are duplicates in a way, and they continue beyond to 44.
There are works that show pretty much no change going from one state to *schlurrp pop* boom its done. Those don't provide any detail and it sucks. On the other hand, giving too much for every pixel of change is annoyingly slow.
Overall the 3D isn't bad. Some of the expressions could use a bit of work here or there, but it's not garbage. Cut down on how much you put into the sequences by at least 50% and you'll have a better flow for a sequence.
I think the point is that you that you see a very gradual transformation instead of a more chopped up version. For image viewers that can rapidly play images in succession tit's not really a bad gallery. I will say though It's kinda confusing this wasn't just compiles into a series of .git files as well.
In any case I actually enjoy the larger image sets that show this. It sorta animates the transformation more when you view the images in order.
Thanks for the constructive feedback, @Tess! I am very much a "process" type of person, so I love to see those individual steps. However, I can understand how one might see it as repetitive or an unnecessary amount of panels. I think something I will try next time is to vary the facial expressions and camera angle a bit more so it doesn't seem so repetitive. Cheers!