This one frustrates me.
Its clearly an internet joke, and a troll, uploaded by an account that upload spams.

Uploaded without tags and a black thumbnail with the expectation that users would "fill in the blanks."
But after a cursory check, these images appear to not be in any other gallery...

So its not actually a Duplicate, Forbidden, or a Replacement from what I can see of the rules.
But without a source I have no idea how complete this is or what its actual name is to petition a rename...

Base +7, ThatCanadianGuy +6, ozymandiaspoem +17, somerandomdude33 +17

@berney

It appears to be stills from an animation by LazySnout

Source: https://twitter.com/LazysnoutA/status/1561741304551424000

It looks complete, as in all scenes of the animation mostly included, but all they did was take screenshots.

Base +7, anonymous12998 +6, ozymandiaspoem +17, somerandomdude33 +17

>screenshots

Which means, this is not "animated", but "screenshots".

EDITED:
For the sake of St. Phuck, they are spread through the gallery.
Is three animated images of 16 enough to clear the "Presence Rule" threshold?

Base +32, somerandomdude33 +17, Qwertius +17, FataMorganaPseudonym -10

That was quite a drama
anyway I'm repurposing this gallery to rate snout's Friend-MN gallery.
should I upload it- NO. fuck you cunt can't even solve furry uploader's drama

Base +14