ai indicator: Only if it's in the gallery title (set by uploader), uploader comment, or written somewhere in the work (including uploader/group credit pages).
At least now it will not depend on the author's words (unless he adds a mark to the work)...
[quote name='Tenboro' date='Mar 10 2023, 10:05' post='6270471'] It no longer necessarily requires a positive affirmation from the uploader, but instead becomes invalid on a negative affirmation from the uploader. In other words, it would be applicable on works that visually appear to be AI-generated, unless the uploader specifically says it's not. (I'm leaving some discretion to gallery mods to overrule blatant misrepresentations by the uploader.)
At least half of the gallery has to be AI-generated for it to be applicable, and it is not applicable if AI was only used as a tool in the process of creating something that does not have the obvious visual appearance of being AI-generated - for example if it's painted over, similar to how many artists use 3D modelling for posing.
This is a kick-the-can solution that will be revised if/when AI becomes capable enough to not be easily distinguishable from real art.
Mostly because there are a lot of renames on obvious AI-generated content that are technically invalid with the currently enforced rules, and honestly it's a) more work than it's worth to not allow them, and b) arguably undesirable to do so all the while AI-generated content is still possible to distinguish from real art in most cases.
To avoid flooding the renaming thread, you can use this thread for stuff related to the AI-generated flag. [/quote]
Now we no longer need the approval of the uploader.