I can't get money from pixiv anyway so i post here

Very nice results, wish there were some without the bra though.

Base +8, MehMeher -5

AI should just do what real artists do (hide the hands)

Base +16, xLucia~ +7

@EDP would you stop copy paste this one comment over the galeries of ai generated images?!
and so why do people hate ai generated images so much here on this site? people like me have no talent for drawing but ideas for such images (18+ and also normal stuff), so why do the haters not allow us to let those ideas come to live?

Base +10, LouisIII +6, defenceofthedota +6, hunterx9 +6, T22d +6, MehMeher -5, Putsch-chan +6

@Enno88
If you want to know, start try looking at page 13 and compare it with it's to the neighboring images.
> people like me have no talent for drawing but ideas for such images
Everyone has ideas. Ideas doesn't mean anything unless you can express it. Your iazyness aren't justification for you to use automatic paintovercollage machine on other people works, and then try to take credit and profit from it.
And ideas like "blonde elf woman with big tits lying on a bed in negligee while having sex" or "elf woman having sex" arent' worthy of expression to begin with.
Just like 99% of ai generated crap being churned out there.

Ai generation arent' expressing your ideas. It's a big lie you megalomaniacs use to soothe themselves. It's essentially a commission to a machine. And machine is bashing together several (often big) parts of images made by an actual artists together. The problem is it's outright stealing of other people IP images they worked hard to produce.

So here's an example. Imagine you churned out this ai stuff. Like 600 of images. Then you put a watermark with your twitter and patreon on it and sitting ready to collect all this money. But instead 100-200 other people replace you watermark with theirs and try to do the same? What would you feel?
Now imagine the but it's actually not 2-3 days on this but 2-3 years. And it's not only your creative work but everything you ever uploaded on a clearnet, and maybe some private stuff you send to you loved one, or medical record.

And no, e-hentai being mostly pirate image website doesn't mean you are justified to take other people images edit it(by yourself or machine) and claim as your own.
Making a free copy of a piece of content, is far less wrong then claiming authorship and trying to monetize it. Which even this guy is actively trying to do
> I can't get money from pixiv anyway so i post here"

Base +7, LouisIII -6, hollywood1 -6, EagleEye89 -14, [email protected] +6, defenceofthedota -6, fletchlives +9, MehMeher +5, Putsch-chan -6

Zellos - Kind of like how mangakas/anime creators and their western counterparts ceate very much copyrighted original characters only for artists to create fan art and make money off it. . .but do you ever raise a stink about that on this site? If there is to be a crackdown on AI for theft and plagiarism then any fan art for profit should also be punished.

Base +7, fletchlives -9, MehMeher -5

@Vaporlocke
Glad you asked. You see there is a several difference between fan art and this ai crap.
1) Fan art by the very definition doesn't rob the credit from the original IP authors. Even the most heinous overpainterplagiarist on Patreon would put the name of the IP they are doing ripping off.
2) The scale. I dare you to find any fanart creator that can overproduce the AI crap churning machine.
10-100 rather different looking image of a character from big IP can't even hope to do the damage that 1000-10000 images of 80-90% similarity to a works of a single artist non affilated with big ip can do.
3) Despite what modern day patreon porn fan-art grifters do, the vast majority of fan art isn't monetized. And what is monetized (like comiket) is so insignificant and exist in such a different market in comparison to main IP scale and profit so it's usually gets is being discarded as free publicity (because, again, they state the original IP creators so they can leach the recognition from them).
4) Fanart for the most part use only trademarked characters appereance. It's not straight up plagiarism of the source IP parts. It doesn't use the same exact frames from animemoive mangapanels with little edits in them.
It's usually someone making an image and using recognizable character from a famouse IP to leach for the reachability of this famous IP.

There are, of course, patreon grifters who do paintover of frames etc but they are a speck of dust in comparison to a current ai craze. And they should be dealt with, yes. And i personally raise a stink about them whenever I can.

So yeah. Read my comment again.
Making a free copy with proper credit, so that the authors of IP can have a recognition, reach and be supported or using a a character appereance from a famous IP while giving ita proper credit; both are a far cry from mass stealing thousands upon thousands people IP for money and boosting your own ego.

Base +7, lolimizuki +7, fletchlives +9, MehMeher +5, seabook4 +6

you guys are right this is not good and not up to my standard right now but i can do way better now

Base +6