Fuck AI bs.

Base +6, meatycore -6, Exham +6, arranger1999 -1, AmazingLord -6, tttttancy +3, darkwing42 -30, cowman13 +6, o0hssj0o -6, nurupo789 -6, duckfucker -12, Ckajal -11, Limrys -6

@gibgob

My friend, all the abuse is not effective, listen to me，If you want to object, minimize your emotional anger, you should tell someone what AI really is, right

Because.....

It's not just between artists and AI, it's between everyone and AI

The AIGC based on pixel distribution characteristics can calculate and forge images. But it all depends on large models, and because of this, AIGC requires a lot of stealing training in order to produce pictures. Because of the need for AIGC, the 5B training set was born. In the 5B training set, there are lots of real children, babies, girls and adults, lots of family photos, and artists' work, and it's not just between artists and AI things

Do you want pictures of you and your parents to be collected and trained by AI? That's a good question, and I want to ask you guys

One problem AIGC cannot avoid is over-fitting. Inevitably, the AI will produce images that are the same or very similar to the training set

So this is not about copyright, which in this case is a moral condemnation

AIGC's biggest problem is deepfakes. Have you seen MJ's pictures of Trump? That's something AI face-swapping and Photoshop can't do. Not many people can do that with Photoshop

Where did the face inside come from? The source of AI is the face in the original training set, that is to say, the face in the pictures it generates is corresponding to the reality, which means that it is unknown which real human face is used by AI. The same goes for SD's mannequins. Every second, the mannequins generate the faces of Korean girls, or similar faces, which are used as toys, mounted inside naked bodies

Everyone should have a duty to object, but most people are addicted to AI porn. Ah, well, this is EH after al

I'm glad to see your objection. But name-calling is useless

AI companies go around collecting unauthorized images in order to collect images, and all L5B-based AI have serious privacy portrait copyright issues

SD has the biggest problem. By making its large model public, it means that everyone is holding a database containing a lot of other people's privacy

The sad thing is that people prefer AI porn to a whole range of issues like privacy.

Every AI user cannot avoid the L5B model, no matter it is real image or virtual quadratic element. No one is willing to contribute their own art works or privacy to the training of AI for these AI users, but those AI users do not realize this point, they are using other people's blood to train AI.

Um.... The machine translation was so full of errors that it was difficult for me to make myself understood

Last edited on 21 May 2023, 23:49.

Base +6, tentacle_aaa -12, shadowray -8, neerko +6, AmazingLord +6, tttttancy +3, Qwertius +17, WanderingIn +1, cowman13 +6, Kuroguma +7, crossorphan3 +6, 猫坑MK +5, MehMeher +6, and 3 more...

@cole The biggest problem with people like you is that you understand the theory but do not understand why these can't be prosecuted successfully. Its because the AI has no understanding of what a human is, what a face or what a hand is, so anything that applies to bad faith regarding such production falls on the users using it, not the AI itself. Suffice to say, the very nature of AI ensures nothing will happen to AIGC.

As for the 5B dataset, that's old news now, there are gazillions of datasets and a true AI artist always makes multiples to have his tastes reflected.

As for unauthorized data collection, that's largely a hoax. When you can get content from the internet, it means that its allowed to be taken. Period.

Base +7, tttttancy -3, cowman13 -6, crossorphan3 -6, MehMeher -6, Limrys +6

谁会喜欢ai尸块

Base +1, lolipz -3, htfans +8

@fpga

In fact, he was sued

These include SD Corporation, MJ Corporation and several other AI companies, all of which have been sued

Ai programming uses code from programmers
A group of the coders filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, demanding 90E damages for the coders

I have a question for you..... Would you want pictures of yourself and your family to be used to train AI?

AI is not supervised, and every AI user will inadvertently hurt others

Or intentionally hurt someone else

I don't understand what you mean by AI artist. In my opinion, they don't quite fit the title of artist. If by AI artists you mean a bunch of people who exploit other people's privacy to make all sorts of erotic photos, forget it, my friend

You think technology is innocent, but this is wrong, because technology is not pure, every technology has capital behind it, and the mind of the developer

Oh, consciousness

I want you to think about his essence, pure one-sided thinking is a very superficial thing

Fraud and other crimes based on AI technology have already begun

Base +6, MehMeher +6, Limrys -6

can someoen tell me which ai makes loli stuff?

Base +8, MehMeher -6