The misc. category is even more completely useless than usual these days. It is absolutely flooded with cheap AI stuff. It seems we may need a new category for containment.
In the meantime, it's too bad I can't rate with negative stars. Wish you'd at least put all this one one gallery instead of twenty.
I do genuinely thank you for your honesty though.
EDP: "Where can we find the real artists whose work was stolen to train this AI?" If the artist shares something publicly for free, IMO it is effectively fair game. If you bring up copyright laws, my response is that those laws are dumb and therefore should not be followed. That doesn't mean I like AI art; I really don't. Rather, I like some of it visually, but don't like how it is cheapening things and how quickly tons of it can be churned out and take up valuable space on these servers that might otherwise have been used for something that I consider to have more artistic merit. But calling using publicly available art for training an AI "stealing" is sort of pushing it. And using copyright law as your justification for disliking AI art feels petty and superficial.