Dickgirl content by a creator on civit.
Loads of varities, styles and characters.
Had to sift through thousands of images.
Also, follow the creator on civit if you like what you see.
Here's the link
https://civitai.com/user/Ampa12
(I'll upload part 2 after a few days)

Too big dicks. IMHO

Base +4, ozmodiar -6, DimDim2804 +6, Slegnier -6

@GenDerben Yeah. I think the dicks are on the "Massive" side but this creator used quite a few styles and characters which is why I added this gallery. Check out my other gallery by openminded, that one's got petite girls with reasonable dick size.

Base +3, ampa12 +6, cgh +9

Pg 31 for the good stuff. Just saving you guys some time

Base +3

If this is not a 5star upload Idk what is...amazing, just look at the quality, the veriety - page 7 is awesome in the bathingsuits with the defiend penises, page 10 and not to mention the schoolgirls of page13;D

Base +6, knolli -13, ampa12 +6, cgh +9

I don't know if it's my place to say this or if I should just shut up, but Ampa12 mostly posts other creator's work with very slight changes (it's called remixing). Initially, she'd take pictures of girls that other creators had created and add a penis to the girl, but then she also started taking pictures of other futa/dickgirl creators and posting them on her page. Some don't mind, some do, especially if you don't give credit which she does NOT. Ampa12 though has _clearly_ mentioned in her bio that she mostly remixes stuff.

E.g. regarding the pictures on page 31 that are similar to image 1213 , those are well-known pictures from other futa creators (I believe the first creator was Oksnfika 7 months ago (search on Civitai img with ID 9070370) and another remix was made from coGqgVnFzvuZKDD_81 6 months ago (img with ID 9982897). Not going to post links since I'm not sure if that's allowed. I'm mentioning these two since they are the originator and highest rated remix, but there are many many others.

I'm aware that a lot of people are going to say, what do we care who created it, this is AI art, they're all the same... I can tell from first-hand experience that generating good AI art is hard, sometimes very hard, especially if you have to come up with your image. People post in Civitai all reproduction steps, so that other people can re-create and/or learn but it's a different story if you just take that image and post it as your own or post a very slight variation.

and yes, I just looked at her recent images and she still does it based on images I recognized (e.g. she posted image with ID 36320972 that she took from another futa creator Scargiver img with ID 34662707)

Base +1, knolli +13, ampa12 -6

@revenge623 guess I had to mention this in the original comment as well. While browsing through the stuff of ampa12, I did so while clicking on a post and then swiping right through it, so I didn't notice any links if there were any, relating to remixes or any mentions, so, my bad ig. I'll be more careful for any other creator I'm uploading in the future by checking the post comments as well. But, for ampa12, I've already downloaded the images, and I don't know if I have the willpower to go through all of them again to check for links, so, please let it slide for this one series.

Base +3

@revenge623

"I'm aware that a lot of people are going to say, what do we care who created it, this is AI art, they're all the same..."

Close but not quite. This is all theft, okay? AI is "trained" by feeding real art from real artists into the system, 99.9% of the time without even checking for their consent. None of this is remotely ethical. The best description for AI creators getting mad somebody stole "their" art is Karma."

Like one out of every ten AI images has the plagiarism robot clearly trying and failing to replicate the source's signature and you're in here with the balls to complain about thieves stealing from thieves. LOL.

Base +5, ampa12 +6

@UnleadedCinnamon

I'm sorry but your perspective is very shallow and you clearly lack an understanding how the AI generation works. That said, even if we follow your line of reasoning, I'm not stealing anything, I'm using a tool to create images. Whether you think that the tool was based on theft, etc it's your problem and you need to come to terms with it or do something about it. . Otherwise you need to stop using Google (since it obviously steals data from a lot of websites) ... or even products from Microsoft and Apple since they stole from Xerox in their beginnings. Heck, the vast majority of Europe is built on slavery and abusing and stealing from other nations through colonialism, etc . If that bothers you, and you want to keep the 'Holier than thou' approach go and live with Aboriginal tribes.

Also I'm not doing this for profit. I don't have a Patreon, I don't want a coffee from you, or for you to join my Deviantart, Discord, Twitter/X or whatever. I'm doing this as a hobby in my free time and happily sharing my work with those that appreciate it.

Also I see nothing wrong in pointing out that if there's credit that should be given (first comment in this thread), it most certainly doesn't belong to Ampa12. No, imo, changing from a picture only whether the dick is leaking precum ... or in other pictures whether there are pubic hair ... is way less than 10% of the effort used to create that image.
If you don't think that credit is warranted, because we're thieves anyways ... then I'm sorry but we'll have to agree to disagree.

Base +2, Coltaine -7, ampa12 -6