Images are a little larger than the previous gallery with the same title.

A little? Lol /g/216055/dbf0fbdcfe/

Base +49, addgrainc +6, distels +10, 海想列車 +23, Bane13 +31

Oh god thank you, man.

Base +7, 海想列車 +23, Bane13 +31

Did you resize it or something? When I zoomed on the pictures, they have alot of jpeg artifacts.

Base +8, Bane13 +31

I don't know if they were resized. I downloaded them from an old site and kept them privately for a while until I decided to distribute them to public.

Last edited on 09 January 2016, 23:22.

Base +6, Bane13 +31

>I downloaded them from an old site and kept them privately for a while until I decided to distribute them to public.

There should be more people like you.

@kitsuneko
As the name says jpeg artifacts are made just like that, by saving something in jpeg. They're not inherently related to resizing, just lower quality than BMP or PNG or JPG with optimal resolution.

Base +11, Bane13 +31, 海想列車 +25

This scan is completely inferior other than for resolution. It has horrible blocky artifacts everywhere, banding, bleed through, and it's over brightened (shading and shadows lost everywhere.)

It's definitely a different scan though. I did an overlay comparison, which makes it easy to tell. It's just sad that this one is visible now and the other one is hidden. Even blown up from x729 to x1600, the old gallery looks better than this one. This one DOES have an extra (plain) back cover though, so really both galleries should stay.

Ditto for #2: /g/669544/3cf06734ba/
same awfulness, but larger res and a few atogaki pages + back cover

Base +30, fdcx +9

Sorry if the satisfaction is not 100% guaranteed.

Base +7