Colored the gray pages in photoshop using the neural colorize method.

AI coloring uploads are allowed? Really?

Base +12, tombola49 +5, yesthoduck +5, Hedonistscum +6, Climhazard88 +7, JustAnotherWeirdo +5

AI coloring is bad. it doesn't understand the content.
(メ｀ロ´)/

Base +3, Hedonistscum +6, NeffyL +6, derp9939 +7, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, Climhazard88 +7, GePingPao +6, track lost +3, KorMeteor +6

I see where people are coming from when complaining about AI works. But I don't think that completely turning against it, just for the sake of going against it is the way to go. Sure AI Art looks bad, but the good thing on sites like these is that I don't have to read it, if I don't want to see it.
You could argue that the site shouldn't be cluttered with bad stuff like AI art. But then we could also talk about certain duplicates or stuff that looks even worse then some AI stuff, which is rude to say but factually not incorrect. At least this gallery doesn't consist of those freaky 'multi-arm' or 'Ai-hands/-feet'. These are just Body-Horror.
But then again, all of this is just basically beating the dead horse that already died when people started complaining about fetishes that they aren't fans of. It's not about accessibility or actual improvement anymore but about the mere act of complaining and fetish-shaming.

In all fairness... a small percentage of the pages in this gallery don't even look that bad. The first 60 pages are very unfortunate, outright bad. And this AI colouring is multiple times better than much of the full AI stuff. I bet, if you don't tell someone that it's AI and you just give them page 113, they will barely be able to tell that AI did this. So, I will stay with my opinion that, if AI-art is done right and not used to replace actual artists or commercial use. It can... maybee, sometimes, seldom, look goo-... okay... and then I don't mind seeing it pop up now and again.
Just... don't forget that you can't spell Art with AI.

Last edited on 02 January 2024, 15:35.

Base +8, JustAnotherWeirdo -5, Climhazard88 -7, 10mcmannia -6, Helshen +6, jumflargin -8, NeffyL -6, Shizuru_Hoshino -4, szneko -6, Hamkate -3, krappycone -6, Dokiliny -6, Halftime -7, and 2 more...

This is shit regardless. Stop filling up the site with garbage.

Base +6, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, Climhazard88 +7, Becurx +6, John•Smith +1, Helshen -6, Ash2743431 +7, GePingPao +6, HigashiKushiro +2, argoner13 -6, Tr2n +9, keyman. +5, makermanman +8

Is there any private contact method or website?
I have some favorite works that I would like to try colored versions of them.

Base +6, Helshen -6, GePingPao -6, HigashiKushiro -2, JustAnotherWeirdo -5, lul96 -6

Can post without the ai colouring one? Cause this is hurting my eyes

Base +3, John•Smith +1, Helshen -6, derp9939 +7, track lost +3, keyman. +5

Funny to see AI apologists making excuses about ruining the doujin on top of pirating it.

Nobody wants this UnPAiD wOrKs bs. If you love the artists so much, t's not hard to just leave it as is without smearing AI garbage on their works.

Plus it's been pirated anyway, why even cry about artist labour fee bs in this site?

Base +6, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, keyman. +5

Man, I'm just tired of always seeing these witch hunts under everything that just has a trace of AI.

I'm not trying to defend this gallery in particular but I don't think the concept of AI usage is something bad inherently.
Technically this isn't even 'AI' it's 'machine learning'. There is no magic button you press and the computer just prints 'Art'
Machine learning Art usually involves intricate setting up and preparation. And, if done right, really good stuff can come out of this. But you always need a human in the process. Like for setting everything up as mentioned. Or maybe the AI gives you a base inspiration upon the artist bases his work or it applies the finishing touches.

Just as I see use for this.
If built upon, improved and used in the right way, for example, AI colouring could help artists who have a variation of colour-blindness and thus struggle with colouring their art in a way that it doesn't look strange for their readers. Maybe their art is top notch. But their colouring is off and the 'not-colour-blind' portion of the audience takes offense in that. AI could help balance that.

But instead of taking tries like this gallery to evaluate and improve everyone just gets out their pitchforks and torches and instanltly wants to see the gallery burn on the stake.

I do realize I am very naive and probably way too optimistic to think that improvement in that area is achieved in the comment section under a giantess hentai.
But... I mean, where to find better specialists for pornographic art than on sites like this?

As I said, I am mainly just tired of seeing comment sections like this, instantly trying to beat down this kind of progress just because it is new and... biggest surprise: "looks bad". No shit sherlock, nobody expected this to look good. Everyone knows that AI+Art is a recipe for disaster.
Why state the obvious? Sure, saying AI Art is bad gets you easy score, quod erat demonstrandum, but I don't even know what that is for on this site. I don't see the worth of repeating what everyone thinks anyways, so why post a comment at all?

Is what I ask myself as well... I know that nobody will care and I'm just here making a fool of myself, I could've just shut up and spared me the headache, which is probably what I will do from now on.

(P.s.: If this was done with a quick Buck in mind, "let's let the AI do something where I don't have to lift a finger for and then make money with it" I am all with you though, down with it. No pure AI Art should be used commercially or/and to replace real art/ists)

Base +8, dudleer -6, CORNCAN -7, JustAnotherWeirdo -5, krappycone -6, Halftime -7, makermanman -8, keyman. -5

Like Zeboim said, regardless of if it was made with AI or not, the end result is objectively bad, so it deserves the bad ratings/backlash.
I get your point (or at least part of it), but you clearly chose the wrong place to go and say it.

Base +19, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, keyman. +5

Agree to moody here,the end result is bad so it gets a bad rating,it is what it is if garbage is showed

Base +3, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, keyman. +5

Just like with shit MTLs, a bad coloring via AI will always get downvoted.

It would be different if it wasn't sloppy/smeared looking. But it is. AI isn't even the main point, that the normal raws could be uploaded for people to do TLs with instead and we get this. Page 15-16 alone is dreadful. It also doesn't help that uploader didn't make a torrent and is shilling for GP to boot, lol.

Last edited on 06 January 2024, 23:09.

Base +7, JustAnotherWeirdo +5, krappycone +6

Where did the original non-Ai colored version go?

Base +8, CommradeChris +5, Hetab +8