Lossless PNG rip.
Replacing /g/36834/ac3a7069fc/

10100GP..... ouch.... will wait for torrent lol

Base +14, kitsuneko +11, sexsex +9

10100gp ... so ?? no discount !! lolols

Base +9, kitsuneko +11, Sao-Rouay777 -12, sexsex -9, xelnaga92 -11

well, 10100GP prices are what you get when you encourage people to "replace" galleries with ones that have at least 500% the size with 0.01% visible quality improvement.

Take one image from the old archive, and find it's equivalent here. Note the file size difference. Then compare the pictures, first looking at the overall image, and on the second pass look for details.

Did you find anything warranting that kind of file size inflation?

Now, think about what extra load it's putting on the network for that price. This network of sites has great capacity, but it's not infinite. What would happen if we inflated half of the files on this network that much?

Edit: To answer your question, failfare, there are 3 differences:
1. An undetectable increase in picture quality.
2. A very detectable increase in picture size.
3. A corresponding very detectable increase in download costs in the site currency.

Of course, I'd already mentioned each of these problems above.

Simply put, the "uploaders" are doing invented and imaginary "work", adding NO new galleries and NO new content but rather bloating the existing ones so they can claim uploader benefits without doing the work of actually finding new content.

Only a fool worries about space and bandwidth issues only AFTER they have already started to affect things, because then it's too late and fixes will be more painful and difficult. Are you sure that total bandwidth and members have no place to go but up, forever?

Concerning yourself about losing 1% of the picture information is a technophobic and ignorant position. Lossy compression algorithms have been used for over a decade now. They are used in your cable TV, most news photos, many other places where you don't notice any loss unless you really, really look for it. If you up the loss to a significant percentage, then yes there's a problem, but you will notice that the "uploaders" do not make that case, do not even bother to check if there are actual artifact problems before smashing the efficient galleries.

Last edited on 19 August 2014, 18:39.

Base +11, sheep_2045 +7, drrdrr +10, junhezhin +7, miburo +9, Lord Janus +12, ezy7 +10, draconian196 +13, kitsuneko +11, Skelder +10, r8221 +12, DesuTimesTwo +8, Absolute_Jushin +9, and 20 more...

Ryann: lose quality is still lose quality.
My opinion: ev + char + bg, all in png(especially char - alpha channel).. perfect work. If char or bg are missing, I download game and rip it yourself.

Base +8, requiem90 +10, Kyokugen -11, theblad -13, Ubersuntzu +7, Apollo-kun 777 -8, sexsex -9, Zero Angel +42, Power of Void +6, acmotoko +8, Raygun +6, Durlag -9

Maybe some ppl want to fap on a 42 inch HD screen?

Base +10, Kyokugen -11, sexsex -9, xelnaga92 -11

I don't care about the file size, just give me the best quality. Also the rules encourage ppl to upload better quality so there is no problem.

Base +17, Kyokugen -11, theblad -13, holy_demon -17, sexsex -9, ezy7 -7

Ryann, what's the big deal? In my opinion, the users of this site should be able to download images it it's maximum quality. As far as I'm concerned, this gallery is better than the old one, lossless and complete. If the old galleries would get deleted, then the space is really a non-issue. Besides, more and more people are signing up for H@H, which alleviates a lot of the site's space problems. If I had full access to my router, I would have given them 100GB on my server.

Base +10, sexsex -9, Zero Angel +42, Thanks -6, Captian Katsura +6, ezy7 -7, Kyokugen -7, conundrum +15

The game does not work on Windows 10, sadly. Has anybody found a way or a version that does?

I think this is one of the best hentai games I have played. Definitely one of Liquid's best, if you prefer more forced scenarios instead of hypnosis.

Base +6, Drayman +6

electric shocks p11-16
p80-89

Base +12